| February 05, 2010, 10:15:44 AM |
CaitlynsMommy
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 16
|
 |
« on: February 05, 2010, 10:15:44 AM » |
|
As I get ready to strip my diapers, I was wondering how cloth diapering is considered AP by a lot of parents.  I can understand environmentalists or "crunchy" types wanting to cloth diaper but why is it usually identified with AP? Just random thoughts this morning.  BTW, we use cloth because of the money saving aspect (unless you get carried away  ) and that DD gets fewer rashes when she is in cloth. I also like the environmental benefits. Thanks for reading my ramblings! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 10:22:15 AM |
|
daisy
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2010, 10:22:15 AM » |
|
the only reason i've heard is that CDing takes more time, thus more positive interactions with baby during changes.  i go thru CDing phases and am currently not in one.  i prefer attaching in other ways. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 10:53:26 AM |
|
Leslie4
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 10:53:26 AM » |
|
I didn't think it was considered AP, but since a lot of AP moms are also crunchy, they seem to be the same moms doing both. I always assumed that's where the association came in.
I tried cloth diapers when my oldest was an infant, but ended up doing disposables by the time he was 6 months old and never looked back. I was able to use cheap disposables, so it was actually cheaper for us.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
~ Leslie ~ INTJ AP Homeschooling Mom to 3 Knights and a Princess ~ I have a blog! ~ "Ho'i hou i ka iwi kuamo'o." ~
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 10:59:22 AM |
|
RachelAbigail
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2010, 10:59:22 AM » |
|
I didn't think it was considered AP, but since a lot of AP moms are also crunchy, they seem to be the same moms doing both. I always assumed that's where the association came in.
 Yeah, it's crunchy, not AP
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rachel "...my spelling is Wobbly. It's good spelling, but it Wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places." - Winnie-The-Pooh
Married to Ben (10-03) and Mama to Jack (5-06), Nora (2-09) and Noel (waiting for us in heaven).
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 11:18:50 AM |
|
doubleblessings
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2010, 11:18:50 AM » |
|
I agree it is not really AP, but for me I DID feel more in tuned/attached when we had them in cloth. I was more aware and changed them more often when they were in cloth. It was very easy to let them be wet in a disposable, because they didn't feel wet and I didn't want to "waste" the diaper. I think it helped mine stay more in tune with their own  senses? and for me to stay more aware of them in reguards to that. However, I don't think that using disposables = unattachement.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 02:20:18 PM |
|
ThursdaysChild
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2010, 02:20:18 PM » |
|
I've been wondering...What the heck is 'crunchy'?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Children are the most delightful pledges of a loving marriage. They are the best wool on the sheep. - Martin Luther  Wife to Baba  Mom to The Boss  , The Little Prince  , and the Diva http://thursdaysmusings.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 02:26:39 PM |
|
TuneMyHeart
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2010, 02:26:39 PM » |
|
I don't think cloth dipes are AP, but I think AP mamas are generally more into things are better for the baby and environment, so there's your explanation.  crunchy -http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=crunchy+mama
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shannon Mama to E 2/06 and AK 9/08
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 02:27:40 PM |
CaitlynsMommy
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2010, 02:27:40 PM » |
|
Thanks, everyone. It being crunchy makes more sense. Here's a pretty good def. of crunchy mama from the Urban dictionary: Mother who supports homebirth, breastfeeding, baby wearing, cloth diapering, co-sleeping, gentle discipline, etc. One who questions established medical authority; tends to be vegetarian and/or prepare all-organic foods. Great minds think alike! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| February 05, 2010, 05:20:12 PM |
|
GodChick
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2010, 05:20:12 PM » |
|
Crunchy types are usually more Earthy, all-natural types. I consider cloth dipes to be "crunchy" but not necessarily AP. I agree that it's just an overlap because a lot of AP moms are also crunchy. I do cloth dipes while babes are exclusively breastfed, when they're easy to wash. Once they start eating food, I use sposies. (disposables) I also use sposies at night, because I have yet to find a cloth diaper that would last the night without being so huge and stuffed with doublers that the baby's back was arched!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
--Michele ("Red") -- ELCA Lutheran, musician, future funeral director, and wife to Cliff for 18 years SAHM to: SERENA - 12/05/02  ** SKYLAR - in heaven 03/04  **SAMANTHA - 03/18/05  **SAMUEL - 05/07/07  , and **SIERRA** - 10/16/09  Godchick70 on facebook http://godchick.wordpress.com
|
|
|
| February 06, 2010, 10:37:13 AM |
|
ThursdaysChild
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2010, 10:37:13 AM » |
|
Thanks for the definition.
I started using cloth diapers when Emile was 1. I liked them and still have them, actually. They're all ratty now and used as cleaning cloths. I started again when the twins were about 7 months old or so. I brought them to Lebanon when we moved here 4 years ago. But they outgrew them, the electricity situation made it a real pain and I had no dryer. I ended up wishing that I'd left the diapers back in the States (or sold them) and brought more books instead. Aunt ended up giving them to some relative that was having a baby.
I like cloth diapers, but they're just not too practical where I'm living now. Good thing my youngest are 5...LOL. But if we end up with another little one, I'd be happy to use cloth over here if it was necessary for their skin, etc. But it wouldn't be my first choice. Back home though...you bet!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Children are the most delightful pledges of a loving marriage. They are the best wool on the sheep. - Martin Luther  Wife to Baba  Mom to The Boss  , The Little Prince  , and the Diva http://thursdaysmusings.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
| February 06, 2010, 07:11:27 PM |
|
MommyGirl
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2010, 07:11:27 PM » |
|
Like others have said, "attachment parenting" and "natural parenting" overlap a lot, but aren't synonymous by any means!
Oh, and we've done both. I really liked cd'ing, but sposies were the better choice for our family at times. I like that in so many areas of life and parenting we DO.have choices. Some are major, some are minor but significant. With moms who want to do the "best" for our families, sometimes the choices are difficult. Other times it can be difficult to discern the "best" from the "best-for-us".
And... In some areas I think we need to be willing to accept and encourage other mothers to recognize that the "adequate" choice is really acceptable. (And, ironically, the merely adequate IS sometimes the "best" for our family and situation!)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Nearly all the wisdom we possess—almost everything we know—can be summed up under the knowledge of God and the knowledge of ourselves." --John Calvin. Wife to the wonder-hubby, Mom to four fabulous boys (9, 11, 12, 14)!
|
|
|
| February 06, 2010, 10:26:29 PM |
|
BlueEyedBoys
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2010, 10:26:29 PM » |
|
So I came at AP from cloth diapering! I was crunchy before I was AP.
I think that once you are willing to question "the mainstream", it leads to more researching and questioning about consecutive parental decisions.
So, for us, we were introduced to cloth diapering and were like, "Oh, that makes sense."
And then we decided to breastfeed longer than "normal".
And that led to co-sleeping (whether we wanted to or not ha!)
Like MommyGirl said, it's easy to get obsessed. Liked the way you put best vs. best-for-us. Big difference, there!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Amanda, Wife to Mark (USMC), Momma to two boys with big, blue eyes: Graeme (2.5) and Cole (8m.)
|
|
|
|